Publiora

Menghubungkan ke Publiora...

Publiora

Demarcation BUMN: Between Private Laws and Public Laws

Cahyani, IndahDjatmiati, Tatiek Sri
Yuridika (Sinta 1)Vol. 0 No. 026 Desember 2019
DOI10.20473/ydk.v35i2.16853

Abstrak

The article titled "BUMN between Private Law and Public Law” aims to find the best solution for crossing the position of BUMN that meets in it two different legal regimes namely private law and public law in Indonesia. Until now it has not been found yet, the most appropriate measure to differentiate BUMN/BUMD is subject to state finance or whether it is subject to the private financial system. Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning state finance has a strong public law nuance representing Hobbes's thinking, while Law Number 19 of 2003 concerning BUMN is stronger in the spirit of private law which represents Grotius' ideas, the problem that arises, namely how to resolve the law dogmatically fairly between the two laws that contain the opposite spirit. The article uses normative legal research methods with a conceptual approach, a statutes approach and a legal case approach. This research resulted in recommendations for the use of legal philosophy as a meta theory for legal theory to be the settlement of the meeting point to find an equilibrium that fulfills a sense of justice.

Kata Kunci

Philosophy of LawMeeting PointBUMN.

Cari jurnal yang tepat untuk naskah Anda

MatchMind AI mencocokkan abstrak naskah Anda dengan ribuan jurnal terakreditasi dan menampilkan rekomendasi terbaik beserta alasannya.

Coba MatchMind

Lihat profil lengkap jurnal ini

Waktu review, biaya APC, statistik sitasi, indeksasi Scopus, dan banyak lagi.

Buka Yuridika

Artikel ini juga tersedia di situs resmi jurnal.

Demarcation BUMN: Between Private Laws and Public Laws | Yuridika | Publiora