Publiora

Menghubungkan ke Publiora...

Publiora

KEPAILITAN LINTAS BATAS PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL DAN PERBANDINGANNYA DENGAN INSTRUMEN NASIONAL DI BEBERAPA NEGARA

Hardjaloka, Loura
Yuridika (Sinta 1)Vol. 0 No. 01 September 2015
DOI10.20473/ydk.v30i3.1952

Abstrak

Currently cross-border insolvency is not a new thing since free trade requires loan agreement with foreign parties. The issues with debtor's assets confiscation in other countries are the recognition and implementation of the domestic's court decision in other countries and vice versa. Based on normative juridical research, Indonesia, Thailand, and Singapore do not recognize bankruptcy decision from other states domestic court due to the application of territoriality principle that debtor's assets in these countries cannot be confiscated by foreign creditors and the bankruptcy decision by those courts will not be recognized and implemented in other countries. With cross-border insolvency bilateral agreements such as between Singapore and Malaysia, the bankruptcy decision of each country can be recognized and implemented in countries which enter into agreements. Different to Japan and South Korea which apply the universality principle so that domestic bankruptcy decision may apply to the debtor's assets abroad and vice versa.

Kata Kunci

ContributionWerda NotaryIndonesian Notaries Association.

Cari jurnal yang tepat untuk naskah Anda

MatchMind AI mencocokkan abstrak naskah Anda dengan ribuan jurnal terakreditasi dan menampilkan rekomendasi terbaik beserta alasannya.

Coba MatchMind

Lihat profil lengkap jurnal ini

Waktu review, biaya APC, statistik sitasi, indeksasi Scopus, dan banyak lagi.

Buka Yuridika

Artikel ini juga tersedia di situs resmi jurnal.

KEPAILITAN LINTAS BATAS PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL DAN PERBANDINGANNYA DENGAN INSTRUMEN NASIONAL DI BEBERAPA NEGARA | Yuridika | Publiora