From Low-Proficiency Loops to Hybrid Scaffolding: Adolescent EFL Learners' Perceptions of Peer-Mediated Vocabulary Learning
Abstrak
Lexical acquisition continues to pose a recurring obstacle for Indonesian EFL learners, largely owing to the scarcity of authentic English exposure beyond the classroom setting. Although peer interaction has been widely regarded as a pedagogically viable alternative, relatively few studies have examined how learners personally construct and interpret meaning from such exchanges within structured vocabulary learning activities. This study adopts a descriptive qualitative approach to examine senior high school students’ perceptions toward peer interaction in the context of English vocabulary learning. Employing purposive sampling, three tenth-grade students representing distinct proficiency levels were recruited as focal participants at a public senior high school in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Data collection relied on semi-structured interviews and non-participatory classroom observations, with the resulting data analyzed through Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase thematic analysis procedure. Four overarching themes emerged from the analysis: (1) peer interaction fosters a psychologically safe learning environment that effectively reduces students’ affective filters; (2) collaborative engagement in shared tasks promotes bidirectional lexical retention among participants; (3) proficiency-homogeneous groupings, particularly among lower-ability learners, generate communicative stagnation commonly referred to as a “low-proficiency loops”; and (4) contemporary adolescent learners strategically draw upon digital tools as part of a “hybrid scaffolding” resource to compensate for the limitations inherent in human-to-human interaction. Collectively, these findings underscore that the success of peer-mediated vocabulary learning is substantially dependent on deliberate instructional grouping decisions and the thoughtful incorporation of technology into the learning process.
Kata Kunci
Cari jurnal yang tepat untuk naskah Anda
MatchMind AI mencocokkan abstrak naskah Anda dengan ribuan jurnal terakreditasi dan menampilkan rekomendasi terbaik beserta alasannya.
Coba MatchMindLihat profil lengkap jurnal ini
Waktu review, biaya APC, statistik sitasi, indeksasi Scopus, dan banyak lagi.
Buka Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian IlmiahArtikel ini juga tersedia di situs resmi jurnal.
