Publiora

Menghubungkan ke Publiora...

Publiora

Rigour in Qualitative Studies: Are we on track?

Suryani, Ani WilujengUtami, Helianti
Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan (Sinta 1)Vol. 22 No. 2 (2020)30 November 2020
DOI10.9744/jak.22.2.47-58

Abstrak

Prior research has explored qualitative studies in relation to the paradigms used. This paper enriches the literature by investigating the quality of qualitative studies in relation to the data collection method and participants' selection. In this study, we collected SNA qualitative paper proceedings from 2007 to 2017. Guided by the minimum criteria of the data collection method described in the literature review sections, we analyze those proceedings. We found the three most common methods used in the studies: interview, observation, and documentation. The majority of the paper clearly stated their data collection method. However, only a minority of them provides a clear description of how the data were collected and how to obtain participants/data used in their studies and why invite dthem in the research. Thus, it is suggested that researchers provide a detail explanation of their methods to show the rigour of the study that they conducted

Kata Kunci

qualitative studyresearch qualityresearch methodrigour

Cari jurnal yang tepat untuk naskah Anda

MatchMind AI mencocokkan abstrak naskah Anda dengan ribuan jurnal terakreditasi dan menampilkan rekomendasi terbaik beserta alasannya.

Coba MatchMind

Lihat profil lengkap jurnal ini

Waktu review, biaya APC, statistik sitasi, indeksasi Scopus, dan banyak lagi.

Buka Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan

Artikel ini juga tersedia di situs resmi jurnal.

Rigour in Qualitative Studies: Are we on track? | Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan | Publiora