Publiora

Menghubungkan ke Publiora...

Publiora

Comparison of TOPSIS and MAUT methods for recipient determination home surgery

Maharani, SeptyaRidwanto, HolisRahmania Hatta, HelizaMarisa Khairina, DynaRivani Ibrahim, Muhammad
IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI) (Sinta 1)Vol. 0 No. 01 Desember 2021
DOI10.11591/ijai.v10.i4.pp930-937

Abstrak

House renovation is given by the government to the community, one of which is the assistance provided in the district. Long Mevery especially Tanah Abang Village, namely House Renovation Assistance. So it is necessary to implement a DSS in determining the recipient of home renovation assistance by comparing MAUT method and TOPSIS to assist the government in determining the right home renovation assistance recipient. There are 16 criteria and their weight values. This study uses the multi-attribute utility theory method (MAUT) and the order of preference technique based on the similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSI) as a calculation method to produce output and determine the level of accuracy of each method. The test in this study uses a confusion matrix and compares real data testing with the results of calculations on the system. The results of system testing using MAUT and TOPSIS methods, the accuracy of the MAUT method is 94.28% and the TOPSIS method is 35.71%.

Kata Kunci

Confusion matrix, Decision support system, Home surgery, MAUT, TOPSIS

Cari jurnal yang tepat untuk naskah Anda

MatchMind AI mencocokkan abstrak naskah Anda dengan ribuan jurnal terakreditasi dan menampilkan rekomendasi terbaik beserta alasannya.

Coba MatchMind

Lihat profil lengkap jurnal ini

Waktu review, biaya APC, statistik sitasi, indeksasi Scopus, dan banyak lagi.

Buka IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI)

Artikel ini juga tersedia di situs resmi jurnal.

Comparison of TOPSIS and MAUT methods for recipient determination home surgery | IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI) | Publiora