Publiora

Menghubungkan ke Publiora...

Publiora

Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Three Models in Detecting Financial Statement Fraud

Achmad HaryadiUniversitas TrisaktiRisna NurmalasariUniversitas TrisaktiYanti, Harti Budi
E-Jurnal Akuntansi (Sinta 3)Vol. 0 No. 030 Januari 2026
DOI10.24843/EJA.2026.v36.i02.p09

Abstrak

Financial statement transparency has become a critical issue in the post–Covid-19 period, particularly in the infrastructur, construction, property, and real estate sectors, which face financing pressures and complex revenue recognition. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the Beneish M-Score, Dechow F-Score, and Altman Z-Score in detecting the risk of financial statement fraud (FSF). A quantitative approach is employed using classification analysis through a confusion matrix, complemented by ROC and AUC testing. The sample consists of 50 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2022–2024 period, with a total of 150 financial statement observations. The results indicate that the Altman Z-Score demonstrates the best performance, with an accuracy of 68%, an F1-Score of 62,5%, and an AUC of 0.742, followed by the Dechow F-Score and the Beneish M-Score. These findings suggest that financial distress is a key signal in identifying FSF. The study concludes that the Altman Z-Score is effective as an early warning system for financial statement fraud risk in the examined sectors.

Kata Kunci

Beneish M-ScoreDechow F-ScoreAltman Z-ScoreFinancial Statement Fraud

Cari jurnal yang tepat untuk naskah Anda

MatchMind AI mencocokkan abstrak naskah Anda dengan ribuan jurnal terakreditasi dan menampilkan rekomendasi terbaik beserta alasannya.

Coba MatchMind

Lihat profil lengkap jurnal ini

Waktu review, biaya APC, statistik sitasi, indeksasi Scopus, dan banyak lagi.

Buka E-Jurnal Akuntansi

Artikel ini juga tersedia di situs resmi jurnal.

Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Three Models in Detecting Financial Statement Fraud | E-Jurnal Akuntansi | Publiora