Publiora

Menghubungkan ke Publiora...

Publiora

A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Effectiveness of Uterine-Sparing Procedures versus Hysterectomy for Adenomyosis: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Fertility Preservation

Pradnyana, I Wayan Agus SuryaKadek Agus Wijaya
Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research (Sinta 3)Vol. 0 No. 021 November 2024
DOI10.37275/bsm.v9i2.1189

Abstrak

Background: Adenomyosis is a benign gynecological condition that can cause significant morbidity, including dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, and pelvic pain. Hysterectomy has been the traditional treatment for adenomyosis, but uterine-sparing procedures (USPs) are increasingly being considered, especially for women who desire fertility preservation. This meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of USPs versus hysterectomy for adenomyosis, focusing on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and fertility preservation. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted for studies published between 2013 and 2024, comparing USPs (e.g., laparoscopic or hysteroscopic adenomyomectomy, uterine artery embolization) with hysterectomy for adenomyosis. Studies reporting PROs (dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, pelvic pain, quality of life) and fertility outcomes (pregnancy rate, live birth rate) were included. Random-effects models were used to pool data and assess heterogeneity. Results: Six studies (n = 1248 patients) met the inclusion criteria. USPs were associated with significantly lower rates of major complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.54, p<0.0001) and shorter hospital stays (mean difference -2.73 days, 95% CI -3.29 to -2.17, p<0.0001) compared to hysterectomy. PROs, including dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, and pelvic pain, significantly improved in both groups, with no significant difference between USPs and hysterectomy. Fertility preservation was significantly higher in the USP group (OR 3.9, 95% CI 3.02-5.03, p<0.0001). Conclusion: USPs offer a safe and effective alternative to hysterectomy for adenomyosis, with comparable improvements in PROs and significantly higher rates of fertility preservation. This information can guide clinicians and patients in shared decision-making regarding the optimal treatment approach.

Kata Kunci

AdenomyosisFertility preservationHysterectomyPatient-reported outcomesUterine-sparing procedures

Cari jurnal yang tepat untuk naskah Anda

MatchMind AI mencocokkan abstrak naskah Anda dengan ribuan jurnal terakreditasi dan menampilkan rekomendasi terbaik beserta alasannya.

Coba MatchMind

Lihat profil lengkap jurnal ini

Waktu review, biaya APC, statistik sitasi, indeksasi Scopus, dan banyak lagi.

Buka Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research

Artikel ini juga tersedia di situs resmi jurnal.

A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Effectiveness of Uterine-Sparing Procedures versus Hysterectomy for Adenomyosis: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Fertility Preservation | Bioscientia Medicina : Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research | Publiora