Publiora

Menghubungkan ke Publiora...

Publiora

KRITIK DIKOTOMI TASAWUF SUNNI DAN TASAWUF FALSAFI AHMAD SIRHINDI

Arif, Muhammad
Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan (Sinta 2)Vol. 0 No. 03 September 2018
DOI10.37680/adabiya.v13i01.4

Abstrak

Though the coming of some tasawuf schools is unavoidable, the dichotomy of these schools namely sunni and falsafi is somehow too far. This dichotomy is at its turn will declare that tasawuf sunni is in the correct path of shari’a, while tasawuf falsafi is not. One of the ambitious sufi’s Imam who made this dichotomy popular is Ahmad Sirhindi. The systematic critic of Ahmad Sirhindi towards tasawuf falsafi gives big impact in the future to the spreading of this binary view. Therefore, to review this problematic classification of tasawuf, the reinterpretation of Ahmad Sirhindi’s argument is needed. This article will explain the dichotomy of tasawuf based on the view of Ahmad Sirhindi and the critical comments on this idea.

Kata Kunci

tasawuf, sunni, falsafi, ahmad sirhindi.

Cari jurnal yang tepat untuk naskah Anda

MatchMind AI mencocokkan abstrak naskah Anda dengan ribuan jurnal terakreditasi dan menampilkan rekomendasi terbaik beserta alasannya.

Coba MatchMind

Lihat profil lengkap jurnal ini

Waktu review, biaya APC, statistik sitasi, indeksasi Scopus, dan banyak lagi.

Buka Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan

Artikel ini juga tersedia di situs resmi jurnal.

KRITIK DIKOTOMI TASAWUF SUNNI DAN TASAWUF FALSAFI AHMAD SIRHINDI | Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan | Publiora